How we tested AI performance on Texas PI legal reasoning
Each model was given the same complex scenarios drawn from real Texas PI practice patterns. Responses were evaluated on a standardized 10-point rubric.
Test cases included multi-defendant Stowers strategy, Chapter 33 apportionment edge cases, TTCA immunity analysis, and unsettled Texas Supreme Court issues.
Scored on actionable guidance, correct statutory citations, case law accuracy, and whether the answer could inform actual litigation strategy.
Responses were checked for fabricated citations, incorrect procedural rules, and misstatements of Texas law. Wynn consistently delivered reliable, verifiable answers.
Stop guessing with general-purpose AI. Get litigation-ready answers trained specifically on Texas law.